What FPGA Development board should you purchase with your hard-earned cash? It is a fair question, and there isn’t always a clear response. Here, we will compare and contrast three FPGA development boards presently on the market. The contrast is restricted to boards which are appropriate to beginning to intermediate fpga programming . Some boards cost thousands of bucks, and it is unrealistic to compare a board of the expense to a board that a hobbyist would probably choose, therefore this contrast looks at three hot boards at the sub-$90 cost point.
The Nandland Go Board
The Go Board is a comparatively new FPGA development board designed by Nandland. At $50, it is the cheapest board on this listing, but it supplies a ton of peripherals for an assortment of different projects straight from the box. It comes with 4 LEDs, 4 Push-Buttons, two 7-Segment Shows, a VGA Connector, along with also an External Connector. The board is programmed, powered, and communicated with through one USB Link, therefore no external power source is necessary.
Another advantage for this board is that it’s encouraged with numerous tutorials available here. Check out the Kickstarter for an overview of some cool jobs.
This board uss a fpga programming at its heart. Lattice is a bigger player in the FPGA market in comparison to Xilinx and Altera; they largely concentrate to lower-capability designs. That is not to mention their high-end FPGAs are slouches, but they appear content to allow Altera and Xilinx duke it out to the very large end of the FPGA market (believe Zync vs. Stratix 10). Lattice has found a great niche market and they appear to be doing very well with it. And really, once you’re making jobs with VHDL or Verilog, you are writing code that is portable between FPGA companies anyhow (because that is rather the point of these languages:to become mobile), therefore Pong will operate equally well if it’s an Altera or Xilinx or even Lattice FPGA.